Comparing my first and second interview, I found that my second interview is quieter than my first one. I didn’t ask my whole questions this time, my purpose to this interview is learning more about Korea. Besides, I changed place to doing interview, first one we doing it in library, the second one I chose Atwood as the place; we ate food, and talked, I thought the climate would be more freedom. It was good for the interview. My second interviewee was also come from Korea, the reason I chose two Korean interviewees is I got this two Korean friends by coincidence, and I am interested about Korean culture. In addition, both china and Korea is in the same culture background, I feel comfortable about it. Both of my interviews were going flow, because we know each other for a while. I did record what I heard information added to the knowledge base from the first one. I knew something about how do Korean dragon boat festival look like, and some culture impaction between Korea and Unite states, and some major differences between these two countries.
My two interviewees are kind of same with culture background, except personality got a bit different. It is nice to talk with them. Transcribing the recorded audio portion is pretty cost me about 30 minutes; I recorded it after us finishing the interview immediately. I am not satisfied my second one so much, the third one could be better, because I saw my most classmates did a good job about their second interview. My second interview focuses less attention about interview questions on paper than first one, and I would try my best with third one, maybe I should choose another culture I interested, Japan might be a good choose for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment